Newtown: Today is not that day

After 9/11 our then President declared that the nation would stand up to those who inflicted the greatest act of foreign terrorism on our soil. (Yes, he was late in doing it; he was bombastic in his assertion; his follow-through was misguided to say the least. But he attempted to propose a solution.) The day of the greatest mass outrage against children since before the Depression, the White House through its publicizer of inaction, Jay Carney, said that “today is not that day” to discuss gun control. Of course we could not have expected the White House to have even the vaguest outline of a plan to deal with the increasing scourge of mass violence in this country. This President’s only policy initiative on gun control in four years has been to make it easier to carry loaded weapons in national parks.

Not that the President is alone in his failure to consider anything that might solve this particular national disgrace. The Democratic Party as a whole has given up even talking about gun control since the failure to renew the assault weapons ban in 2004, a ban which would have covered one of the weapons carried by the murderer at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

And while the White House Press Secretary attempted to deflect inquiries about the inaction of this White House to another day, on that very day the President said: “[W]e’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.” But of course it is the failure of this President and his Party to lead rather than cower in fear of the rightwing menace in this country, whose gun arm is funded and enforced  by the NRA and similar groups, and that failure is the heart of the problem. Hope is a slogan not a policy initiative. And it’s not even an accurate slogan.

And just to punctuate what a black joke the policy process in our country has become, John Boehner, the leader of the party who will oppose all solutions to everything other than reducing taxes and contraceptives, responded to the President by saying: “I’m not the expert on this. but if the president’s got ideas, I’d be happy to look at it.”

Of course, why should the Speaker of the House have any ideas? After all, it’s not like a member of the House has been shot in the head during a mass shooting. Or that movie theaters or shopping malls have been invaded by armed murderers in any recent time. So there is no reason why the Party of the NRA should have had any occason to have  considered it.

I won’t even discuss the response of certain gun industry pandering groups, who suggest that the solution is to eliminate all laws preventing guns in schools or otherwise loosen gun control to return to the idyllic times of the Wild West. They will not rest until guns can be sold in schools and at newstands outside shopping malls and movie theaters.

It is not simply a question of gun control. There is no initiative on mental health issues in this country. But of course today is not the day to discuss those problems either. There will never come such a day. Our political system is not capable of dealing of dealing with either guns or health. We have ceded all political decisions to groups with access to large amounts of capital: the NRA, the large corporation, the investment banks. Only when it is in their interests will anything happen. And, God knows, their interests are not ours.

 

Advertisements
    • Free Shooter
    • December 17th, 2012

    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants: Thomas Jefferson. Hang & shoot is what America is all about! Islam ate Besantium and reds ate czars because they didn’t execute anyone. Now Putin don’t like us giving assault rifles to Syrian freedom fighters. Better bloodshed than slavery! When Caesar put down Celtic liberty, all we got was fascist empire.

    • That, my friend, is what we call magical thinking. I suppose you believe that allowing people to collect as much fire-power as possible will allow you to resist some sort of tyrannical coup or other infringement on your liberty. How much firepower do you think you and the militia groups will need to take on the government that spends half the word’s annual military budget? Not to mention the various other armed agencies, FBI, AFT, Secret Service, state and local police, etc., all of whom will fight against “liberty” and for the established order, as professional police have always done throughout history.

      And if you think the right-wing groups you evidently align yourself with will be on your side for “liberty” in a confrontation with the US government, then why are they always in support of higher, not liberty-enhancing lower, military budgets? In fact, Jefferson and Madison believed (like all whigs of the time) that there should never be a standing army. But there is. And the right wing wants to make it bigger.

      Who is the bigger threat to life and liberty? The people who want policy to be determined in the public sphere or the right wing who reflexively supports larger authoritarian expenditures? Or do you think a military coup is your best hope for freedom? Like in Argentina or Chile?

  1. December 17th, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s